Display pilot Bill Ramsey reveals a few of the considerations facing airshow pilots the world over, and he wants us all to bear them in mind before we put the boot in!
Like many display pilots I occasionally venture onto enthusiasts’ forums to get some feedback as to how the public thought the airshow had gone and yes, it’s lovely when people have enjoyed your display. But it’s the criticism that can be most useful, together with the videos – for most of us would never get to see what our displays actually look like otherwise.
On the other hand, uninformed criticism is frustrating, especially when it is, well, just plain wrong. I thought therefore it might be of interest to this audience if I did a short article about some of the many and varied factors which can make a display appear less than brilliant to the casual observer, but which may actually have been technically outstanding.
Never forget that whilst we love to entertain, our primary responsibility is crowd safety.
Don’t get me wrong, anybody can have an off-day, so it might have been genuine, self-induced rubbish but, in my experience, the harshest critic of a display pilot is usually himself, or herself. As you’ve probably seen, the professional military teams always video their own displays and a full and, believe me, frank debrief is always carried out before the next display. A display pilot who isn’t both self-critical and open to reasoned criticism probably won’t last long.
I thought I’d start with the biggest and universal factor – the great British weather! Low cloud and rain are I suppose obvious, but what about visibility on a lovely summer’s day? On the ground it can appear wonderful but in the air it maybe a different story. The longer the weather is settled the more all the crud in the atmosphere descends towards the surface, so for our intrepid pilot, the airborne visibility may be much reduced. Looking into sun during the late afternoon can be almost like fog, known as ‘goldfish bowl’ conditions, removing many of the visual references and cues necessary for an uninhibited display. Now, imagine it’s also a seaside show over a calm sea – I promise you, this is now becoming hard work!
The less experienced the display pilot, the more this (and all other weather factors) are likely to affect the display. Don’t forget that for most RAF displays there is often a new pilot each year and therefore a new and steep learning curve each season. In my first year on the Tutor, I flew a flat display at Sanicole on what appeared to be a lovely autumn day for exactly this reason.
Whilst I’m on the subject of things you can’t see, air-turbulence deserves a mention – you know, the bumps you sometimes get whilst flying off on holiday. This can degrade the performance of light aircraft in particular, to the detriment of the display. For those who have been lucky enough to go there, Jersey can be a classic example of this with its beautiful bay, surrounded by high ground, over which a horridly bumpy wind sometimes blows. In bigger / faster aircraft which are normally flying turns close to the aircraft’s permitted G limit it can sometimes be necessary to fly turns with less G to avoid a bump taking you above the airframe limit.
Other things you can’t see but really mess up (in particular) light aircraft displays, are the height of the airfield above sea-level and temperature. So, for example, on a hot day at Biggin Hill (600 feet above sea level) I once had to stop my full, aerobatic display and revert to the flat one simply because the Tutor’s little engine couldn’t provide the power in the conditions. I doubt if it looked good to the crowd but there was nothing I could do about it.
Last, and absolutely the most important, of the invisible elephants in the room is the wind, and this affects every single display greatly! Perhaps oddly, it is not the size or weight of an aircraft which determines how much it is affected, but it is its speed which governs everything. The slower it goes the more the effect, so for example, an Extra as flown by The Blades reacts exactly the same in the wind as the Vulcan, as both are being flown at around the same speed. I don’t know about you, but I find that gob-smacking!
Another fact you may not be aware of is that the wind usually gets stronger as you go up. So on a windy day with say 35 knots of wind on the ground, this will probably be 45-50 knots at display heights. Oh, and the direction it blows from usually changes as well. Talk about 3D chess!
So, what do I mean by the wind effect varying with aircraft speed? Well, the maths are a bit complicated so don’t expect me to explain them! But let’s say there are two aircraft flying in the same direction with a wind of 40 knots blowing directly across them from the left. One is flying at 120 knots (like the Tutor) and one is flying at 420 knots (Typhoon for example, typical fast-jet speed). The slow one will have to point 20 degrees into the wind just to maintain its direction and track over the ground. The fast one will only need to point around six degrees into the wind to do the same thing. To put it another way, the consequence of getting this wrong is much bigger in a slow aircraft than it is in a fast one.
Now let’s put the same wind directly in front of, or behind, our aircraft. This wind changes the Tutor’s groundspeed (what the crowd sees) by a whopping 33% of the speed indicated in the cockpit, whereas for our Typhoon it’s a much less daunting 10% or so. This means that your Tutor, Lancaster or even Vulcan have to spend a lot of time fighting back into the wind to stay in front of you during a display in these conditions. This doesn’t make for the best display, but cannot be avoided…..
The worst wind of all is the one which blows directly at you, the crowd. For your safety, CAA regulations lay down very strict minimum distances in front of the crowd which display aircraft must keep outside of. For the reasons above it is necessary to display further away from the crowd in this strong “on crowd” wind to avoid infringing these safety distances. Each time our slow aircraft passes in front of the crowd, flying left-right or vice versa, if the pilot did not account for the drift from the wind, the aircraft would end up around 1000 yards behind you! So if you sometimes think a display looks a bit more distant than usual, maybe that’s the reason?
Of course, in the real world the wind is usually not in front, behind or across the display, but somewhere in between. It’s rarely the same twice so there’s a lot going on in the pilot’s mind during every display, on top of all the other variations I’ve mentioned, and actually flying the aircraft of course!
Well, that’s enough about things you can’t see, but I just want to mention briefly two other things I often read. First “such and such a type doesn’t display half as well now as it did many years ago”. Well, maybe people are just trying to preserve its flying life? More importantly however, the regulations covering what you can and can’t do in a display have changed almost beyond recognition – again, it’s all about public safety.
Lastly, I can’t go without mentioning the famous Vulcan howl and I’ve read more tosh about that than almost anything else! First, from my ringside seat, I promise you that none of the pilots handle the throttles in any way differently to each other to generate the howl. Whilst I’m not at all sure about all the magic that makes the noise, I am pretty sure the crowd hears it best when the wind is blowing it towards them. Simples!
I hope this has been of interest and maybe will help people to decide better if they are making a fair criticism when they get home from a show. If anyone – display pilot or otherwise – wants to disagree or ask a bit more, please get in touch by posting a comment.
Enjoy your display season.
Bill Ramsey
Just discovered this very good article by Bill (Ramsey).
Displaying aircraft whether solo aerobatics or formation is hard work.
‘La critique est aisée mais l’art est difficile’
Criticism is easy but art is difficult. ;-))
Cheers.
http://www.aerobuzz.fr/IMG/png/yak-52_photoflying_days_2012_1_.png
http://ukga.com/classified/view?contentId=29581
http://ukga.com/images/content/image29581.jpg
Have seen the Tutor display flown by Bill during the Sanicole Airhow in Belgium
(not the flat display mentioned in the article) … Very nice ! 😉
KR.
http://www.airshowactionphotography.com/san07/page1.html
http://www.airshowactionphotography.com/san07/sanicole07_015.jpg
http://www.airshowactionphotography.com/san07/sanicole07_018.jpg
http://flightplanet.com/adimg/146/640×0/yak-52-flight-training—yak-52-check-out—yak-52-aerobatic-training__1.jpg
…
Hi Bill, A question about what you said (regulations covering what you can and can’t do in a display have changed almost beyond recognition) so I was wondering what has changed that you could do years ago that you can’t do now?
Regards
James
Hi James, sorry to be slow answering your question but I’ve been away with 558 down in the South West for the last few days. There’s not space here to cover everything which has changed and to be fair it is, I’d say, almost everything which has changed to improve safety. But here are two examples. The crowd-rear arrival was I believe open to anyone before the Ramstein accident. Now in the UK it is limited to a very few. Second, if you look at old films, aircraft like the Vulcan routinely did touch and go approaches during a display. Not anymore, as the runway is usually inside the minimum separation distance between a display aircraft and the crowd. So at, for example, Waddington, an aircraft may take off and land, but not as part of the display. Hope that answers your question.
Bill
Hi Bill,
Firstly it’s an absolute honour to meet you 🙂 I found it really interesting to read about the things that goes on in a pilots mind when they’re thinking about the wind directions and the sun etc. Myself personally and from my point of view, I absolutely enjoy all aircraft displays, even if they sometimes have to be cut short for the right reasons..
This years Airshow at Waddington was absolutely brilliant, caus not only was I able to see the lovely old lady do one last flying display at Waddington, but also I was lucky enough to meet Martin Withers.
I read your biog on the Vulcan to the Sky website, and I noticed that you did your first tour on the Vulcans at Scampton on 35 Squadron. I understand that a lot of guys and girls in the RAF all know each other, even some may have been on different squadrons, which is a bit like musicians, where everyone knows each other.
Whilst you was at Scampton, did you ever meet any other guys from different squadrons? particularly 617 Squadron?
My Granddad, John Martin served in the RAF for 24 years. His last 7 years in the RAF, he was a Crew Chief on 617 Squadron. The Vulcan that he was allocated to was XL426 🙂 who I’ve yet to go and see her sometime this year, if not not next year..
I was going to ask Martin Withers the same question, but didn’t a chance as he had to go after he signed my copy of ‘Vulcan 607’, which I did understand of course.
Kindest regards
Dave – DKM Music
JUST LIKE TO SAY A BIG THANK YOU TO ALL THE GUYS & GIRLS WHO KEEP THIS BIG BIRD FLYING…I ENJOY IT ALWAYS SHE WONT BE THERE FOR EVER SO MAKE THE MOST OF THE PEOPLES VULCAN.
Picture link did not work. Trying this
http://i268.photobucket.com/albums/jj29/John_C_R/Airbourne%202012/Vulcanclimbout2.jpg
Hi John, great picture. Not seen that one before. Looks more like the Med than the Channel!
Cheers
Bill
I can certainly echo Bills statement about the Vulcan howl, As I have seen people complaining how at Waddington it didn’t make the howl,
I can assure you being on the live side for its display, it made one hell of a howl!
The wind was blowing from show side to live side
Dear Bill it is nice to see XH588 in the air again I remember it at Waddington on 101 squadron. There was a pilot by the name of John Huggins who could do a figure of eight within the confines of the Airfield which he did several time to impress our American guests when they competed against us in bombing compotitions – keep up the good work
Superb article, amazing that wind affects the Vulcan the same as it does a small aerobatic aircraft simply because they fly at the same speed! Keep up the good work.
Thanks Bill for the excellent article! I’ve a question about rolling. I’m aware Vulcans have been rolled in the past, & that it’s possible to do so with positive g for the whole manoeuvre. I’ve seen Bob Hoover’s amazing video of pouring tea while rolling, so this must presumably be close to normal g throughout? I’d also imagine that doing a wing-over & reversing it would be a relatively (within the display limits) high g operation, at least for the wing? Can you therefore explain why rolling 558 doesn’t seem to be on the cards? Is it a display-rules thing, or is there some other limitation. Thanks!
Hi Tim, thanks for the question. You are taking me into theory and regulations again I’m afraid. First, you’re right, I believe the Vulcan was barrel rolled a bit long ago. In RAF service it was an illegal manoeuvre then as it still is now as the Vulcan never had a clearance to fly aerobatics (any old and bold Vulcan pilot want to put me right?). It would never be permitted by the CAA or even thought of as sensible by us. You are also correct that a properly executed barrel roll is all positive g and,if flown correctly, in theory pretty much any aircraft can barrel roll at around 2g – incidentally roughly our own limit. Here is the rub. Whilst it might look easy, the barrel roll is one of the hardest aerobatics to get right- indeed I think it has probably killed more display pilots than any other. It is very easy to become disorientated and end up with the nose very low and lose a lot of height, which usually doesn’t exist for a display pilot. This also leads to a pilot pulling more g to stop the descent which means aircraft with low g limitations will over stress their aircraft. For these reasons, I strongly recommend would be display pilots to get some good instruction on how to fly barrel rolls and recognise one which is going wrong before they nip off and try one at low-level. Hope that answers the question.
Bill
Very informative article Bill – Always useful to have a second string to bow (Airshow Commentator/Author perhaps )
As for top surface how about an inverted pass less than 20 degrees AOB —- am only kidding guess the lady is getting too old for rolls and barrel rolls. At least we could do them in the Waddo Stimulator never did persuade OC Standards to let me try landing a real one.
Again many thanks for all your time and efforts with XH552 and many hours to come
Enjoyed your article Bill. Great to see you are still flying the Vulcan 37 years after we were last together in one. Very best wishes to you and the team.
Hi Roger. blimey! What an unexpected bonus from this little article. For everybody else Roger was my Flight Commander on No 35 Sqn Vulcans and the Navigator (Radar) on the crew of which I was the co- pilot – Crew 3, captained by Flt Lt Glynn Lewis. Roger, I’ll ask the GAR guys to let you have my e-mail address so we can catch up.
Regards
Bill
Hi Bill – a very interesting read. I was due to be at Waddington at the weekend to see my favourite plane XH558. I was installing the site security cctv for the show fell off a ladder and broke my leg quite badly tib / fib and ankle, so missed the show am VTS member and support where I can. Please keep up with this sort of informative information, I need a good read.
Regards
Jim
I understand from the Ramstein accident why a/c cannot fly towards the crowd but why can the Red Arrows overfly them from behind during their opening sequence?
Also at some point the aircraft must have some energy towards the crowd, so is there an element of acceptable risk if that makes sense?
Lastly as a pilot I’m of course not jealous that you get to fly the Vulcan – all that wing and power.
Hi good questions. Sorry but it becomes a bit technical. If I get it wrong I’m sure someone will put me right. The crowd rear arrival is strictly limited following the Ramstein accident. So in my time with the Red Arrows, 10 years ago, it was not allowed. Over the years the relevant authorities have allowed a very limited number of military and highly professional teams (like the Blades) to exercise that privilege. For aircraft like the Vulcan which operate on what’s called a Permit to Fly that permission may never happen. Be assured we do ask. Of course we’d love to. Your second question. Yes the speed of an aircraft whilst pointing at the crowd is regulated. In short, whilst it’s a bit complicated, if the aircraft is pointing at the crowd at a speed above, I believe, 300 knots, it must not get closer to the crowd than 450 metres. For slower aircraft they may approach to closer distances depending on their speed. It’s further complicated by differences in the rules which govern civilian shows and military ones, but that’s kind of it. There are others in this comments bit who fly different types of aircraft who might comment if I’m wrong in some detail. For the civilian rules you can look at CAP403 issued by the CAA if you really want chapter and verse. Hope that answers your questions.
Bill
Ted Girdler was a friend for many years. I always wanted to get over there to visit with him at his home at Burton – On-The- Water but we just never had the right time in place to do it.
Ted was with the Reds during the 1971 visit to the Transpo show at Dulles here in the states.
During the early practice using the Gnats, the team was brought directly toward the grandstands and low at the crowd.
We had a “meeting” with the team and the FAA show line rules were “revisited”. The Reds complied as the gentlemen they were and the show went on correctly flown.
Aside; we lost several people that week during the show including Joe Howard with the Thunderbirds. It was a bad week.
I miss Ted. He was a great guy !
Hi Dudley, I ‘m still in touch with Ted’s family who are staunch members of the UK light aircraft and display community. I’ll ask the GAR guys to give you my e-mail address so you can get in touch if you’d like to know more. Small world!
Bill
Hi Bill;
Feel free to establish a personal contact between us via my private email dudleyhenriques@gmail.com
Dudley
Thank you so much for a wonderfully informative article. I hope some of the ignorant people who are so quick to criticise read this and realise that it’s a lot more complicated than they think. Quite fascinating from the viewpoint of a ground bound ignoramus!
Bill, this is a wonderful Insight into what goes into a public display especially for those of us who really don’t have a clue how much effort goes into it, but, it seems to me people should be greatful they have the opportunity to see these beautiful aircraft at all. They should also be reminded of the phrase “if you can’t say anything nice, don’t say anything at all”
What a straightforwardly informative – and interesting – article.
I rarely comment on the quality of a display, as I have no experience of flying one, but I do hear some peculiar comments.
This article tells me a lot in a short space, and it’s so clearly written, too: plenty of information but not in mysterious jargon.
My respectful bow before display pilots will have to be a little bit lower from now on!
To agree with one or two comments, topside shots are always welcome but usually frustratingly elusive.
That’s NOT a complaint.
Many many thanks.
Well stated Sir. As a wannabe flyer for all my 51 years, i’m far from an expert, but know enough by now to understand limitations, from weather to ‘elf an safetey, imposed on all flyers, let alone in crowded, and sometimes urban/semi urban areas, and crowed airshows with spectators not only on the field, but filling every vantage point around. Only time i criticised a show was the Reds one year at Portrush, Northern Ireland, due to iffy PA system, and being without my rusty airband, and then only for shortness of appearance. Only later did i find they were two aircraft down. (Amusing but i’m sure a dangerous situation for the RN pilot/crew, hearing on airband that the Swordfish couldn’t make a show in Northern Ireland, as was presently flying backwards over Isle of Man due to high winds). Never seen a bad airshow yet – if your heart’s in the sky they’re all good. Will reluctantly admit the Patrouille de France and Armée de l’Air aren’t half bad too – i’ve been living here too long. Starting to get micro shows now as pilots start doing recons of the local field for the 14th July airshow. Stuff the detractors Bill and enjoy the flying and the adulation the genuine airheads who wish they were in your place. Maybe be lucky enough to catch you at Prouvy-Valenciennes or as it has recently been renamed Aerodrome Charles Nungesser. From habit i salute every non big fat airliner with a “Bonjour Nungesser”. Fly within the limits but to your heart’s content Bill.
Very good stuff Bill, some things make sense now. Said that you must do something especial, call it the Ramsey touch, but the most memorable and commented displays of the Vulcan are with you at the helm. You must do something good, hat’s off to you! 🙂
Excellent piece. I suggest a copy be sent to ICAS for inclusion in an OpsBull.
Thanks for doing it.
DH
Dudley, forgive my ignorance but what is ICAS?
Bill
ICAS is the counterpart for your EAC over there.
International Council of Air Shows, our governing body for all display flying done in the US.
Thanks Dudley, in UK Google comes up with the Institute of Chartered Accountants! If you feel the article might help young display pilots, aid Safety or inform your own airshow crowds please feel free to copy the link to ICAS. Obviously I’d like to come and do a presentation!
Transatlantic Greetings
Bill
I’ll reference the article to them.
DH
It’s the International Council on Air Shows, Bill. I gave a lunchtime presentation to their Regional Conference in Rochester, NY once. (I think most of them fell asleep!)
Many thanks for a first class article which gives an insight into the factors affecting any display. Every airshow pilot tries his level best to give a professional and entertaining show in the prevailing conditions.
Well said, Barry! Or should I say, ‘Holder of DA No.1’? Thanks for the memories….Ross
Many thanks for the comment Ross. I had around 55 years as an airshow pilot with over 2300 display performances and enjoyed (nearly) all of them. Eyesight problems led me to retire a couple of years ago. Ah well – Tempus fugite. Best wishes.
Hi Barry, thanks for the kind comment. It’s always good to know that a true expert doesn’t disagree with my thoughts.
Regards
Bill
Barry – Surely Tempest fugite?
I was at waddington on sunday and displays were as polished as ive every seen brilliantly displayed aircraft showing there abilities to the best
Well said Bill, possibly the most satisfying, and at the same time frustrating, job I have ever done!!!!
Absolutely fantastic article Bill, very informative, I’ve certainly learned something. Reading this has left me in even more awe of what display pilots do. Thank you.
Great article very well written and hopefully it will open a few peoples eyes to the world of display flying well done sir.
Having seen a tragic air show fatality once, I never want to see it again. Safety first, second & third. Some armchair critic/keyboard warriors think they know better but cant even drive a car safely, let alone an aircraft!
I thank you sincerely for every single second of every safe display your perform & am in awe of any pilots skill but display pilots deserve more recognition of their art.
Don’t give a thought to the critics, unless they have flown in your shoes, think only of the thousands of smiling waving fans who get a buzz from seeing you in the air, doing what you do so well.
Thank you 🙂
Well said Bill
I think display pilots do a fantastic job! I’ve been visiting air shows for years and so have seen a few changes but the skill of the pilots always amazes. I especially love our historic aircraft, so if their displays have to be moderated over the years in order to keep them flying, it seems a small price to pay for the pleasure of seeing them in the air.
A really interesting and enjoyable read – much appreciate you taking the time to do this and thanks to GAR for publishing it, too. I’ve certainly learnt one or two new things!
At last… a well written, informative, knowledgeable and witty explanation. I get quite frustrated trying to explain to non pilots the variables that a pilot has to account for whilst flying, let alone in a display ( I am a Private Pilot, not a professional ) I hope you will not mind if I either plagiarise your article or simply refer the ill informed to it !!
Please feel free, in this case I don’t think a little knowledge is a dangerous thing! Fly safe
Thank you very much for this. An uninformed remark about the quality of a flying display always raises my hackles. I doubt that many spectators realize the hundreds of hours of training and practice that are behind an individual’s display. From what I have seen of display flying (and I was involved in the organization of air displays at a high level) I was always staggered by the sheer amount of hard work needed to gain a DA or PDA – and to maintain that standard of proficiency. So, my hat is off to Wing Commander Ramsey, the rest of the flight crew of 558 and – it goes without saying – the many engineering and support staff that make each flight possible. Well done, indeed!
Thanks Ross, how’d this get to Uncle Sam so fast!
Reading this was very interesting and just makes what all display pilots do even more impressive than it already looks.
Also keeping nine planes together (Red Arrows) must take one hell of a lot of skill.
I’ve got a lot of respect for all you display pilots.
Keep safe.
Cheers Mark Barlow
Thanks Mark glad you enjoyed it
Having not seen the display in question I can offer no comment but my one complaint about Vulcan displays in general is that being a photographer (very amateur!) I like to see the topside of the a/c as it passes and this does not happen with the Vulcan. The one exception was when it was flown past Beachy Head a couple of years ago causing a mass orgasm amongst the assembled enthusiasts. I appreciate that topside passes involve a turn towards the crowd but I am sure that this could be managed as other jets do it.
Hi John, good question! Glad you liked the Beachy Hold, I enjoyed flying it! In short that was a good place to see the topside because of the shape of the coast and the high vantage point. Less easy in front of a long crowd line because even with a little bank we still end up pointing at the crowd before the mid point and end up with an ungainly bank reversal to avoid busting the display line (a capital offence). If we use more bank the problem gets worse and we have to climb to 500 ft instead of our 300 ft flypast limitation as above 20 degrees angle of bank it is classed as a display manoeuvre. Best chance is a display with a short crowd line where we can fly around the crowd – Little Gransden would be a good example. Hope that explains the problem a bit
I was interested in the answer to that topside question too: thankyou! Although I feel the tradeoff at Waddo on Sunday this year was that we got tons of howl which was nice!
First of all, as you did the Beachy Head display thank you for the mini display as you were waiting for your turn, though I don’t know what the people in the boat thought (I hope the attached picture can be seen)
[IMG]http://i268.photobucket.com/albums/jj29/John_C_R/Airbourne%202012/Vulcanclimbout2.jpg[/IMG]
Regarding the displays, I did not know about the 300/20 rule but could you do what other jets do and that is come in ‘around the corner’ at the end of the display line which is where the ‘enthusiasts/nutters’ gather in the hopes of getting a topside shot. I’m sure we wouldn’t mind you being at 500ft given the size of the Vulcan. You could then straighten out and fly parallel to the display line. Please repeat from the other end to give the other set of us a topside shot as well.
Hi John, that can sometimes be done. I suppose I should point out that whilst everyone loves a great photo, we don’t fly any display for that purpose. Every time it is for the vast majority, that is people who maybe take their kids to one show each year, who just want to see whatever aircraft display. As an expert, I’m sure you know of places where you will get the best opportunity of a special image. Obviously Beachy, but also Dawlish, Windermere and several places in Devon come to mind.
Bill
I’d just like to echo appreciation for the inspired ‘Beachy Head Pass’ which surely is one of the all time greatest display video pieces on the web…what a sight. And those of us who are mindful of the value of down time at weekends, are alive to the family time sacrificed during the year to fly for us – thanks to the ‘other’ support team.